More details and advanced usage of the vaeac approach

Lars Henry Berge Olsen

Source: vignettes/vaeac.Rmd

In this vignette, we elaborate and illustrate the vaeac approach in more depth than in the general usage. In the general usage, only a few basic examples of using vaeac is included, while we here showcase more advanced usage. See the overview above for what topics that are covered in this vignette.

vaeac

An approach that supports mixed features is the Variational AutoEncoder with Arbitrary Conditioning (Olsen et al. (2022)), abbreviated to vaeac. The vaeac is an extension of the regular variational autoencoder (Kingma and Welling (2014)), but instead of giving a probabilistic representation of the distribution p(๐ฑ)p(\boldsymbol{x}) it gives a probabilistic representation of the conditional distribution p(๐ฑ๐’ฎโ€พโˆฃ๐ฑ๐’ฎ)p(\boldsymbol{x}_{\bar{\mathcal{S}}} \mid \boldsymbol{x}_{\mathcal{S}}), for all possible feature subsets ๐’ฎโŠ†โ„ณ\mathcal{S}\subseteq\mathcal{M} simultaneously, where โ„ณ\mathcal{M} is the set of all features. That is, only a single vaeac model is needed to model all conditional distributions.

The vaeac consists of three neural networks: a full encoder, a masked encoder, and a decoder. The encoders map the full and masked/conditional input representations, i.e., ๐ฑ\boldsymbol{x} and ๐ฑ๐’ฎ\boldsymbol{x}_{\mathcal{S}}, respectively, to latent probabilistic representations. Sampled instances from this latent probabilistic representations are sent to the decoder, which maps them back to the feature space and provides a samplable probabilistic representation for the unconditioned features ๐ฑ๐’ฎโ€พ\boldsymbol{x}_{\bar{\mathcal{S}}}. The full encoder is only used during the training phase of the vaeac model to guide the training process of the masked encoder, as the former relies on the full input sample ๐ฑ\boldsymbol{x}, which is not accessible in the deployment phase (when we generate the Monte Carlo samples), as we only have access to ๐ฑ๐’ฎ\boldsymbol{x}_{\mathcal{S}}. The networks are trained by minimizing a variational lower bound, and see Section 3 in Olsen et al. (2022) for an in-depth introduction to the vaeac methodology. We use the vaeac model at the epoch which obtains the lowest validation IWAE score to generate the Monte Carlo samples used in the Shapley value computations.

We fit the vaeac model using the torch package in ๐–ฑ\textsf{R} (Falbel and Luraschi (2023)). The main parameters are the the number of layers in the networks (vaeac.depth), the width of the layers (vaeac.width), the number of dimensions in the latent space (vaeac.latent_dim), the activation function between the layers in the networks (vaeac.activation_function), the learning rate in the ADAM optimizer (vaeac.lr), the number of vaeac models to initiate to remedy poorly initiated model parameter values (vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize), and the number of learning epochs (vaeac.epochs). Call ?shapr::setup_approach.vaeac for a more detailed description of the parameters.

There are additional extra parameters which can be set by including a named list in the call to the explain() function. For example, we can the change the batch size to 32 by including vaeac.extra_parameters = list(vaeac.batch_size = 32) as a parameter in the call the explain() function. See ?shapr::vaeac_get_extra_para_default for a description of the possible extra parameters to the vaeac approach. The main parameters are directly entered to the explain() function, while the extra parameters are included in a named list called vaeac.extra_parameters.

Code Examples

We now demonstrate the vaeac approach on several different use cases. Note that this vignette runs on CPU, but all code sections below can be run on GPU too. To enable GPU, we have to include vaeac.extra_parameters = list(vaeac.cuda = TRUE) in the calls to the explain() function.

Basic Example

Here we go through how to use the vaeac approach on the same data as in the general usage

First we load the shapr package

First we set up the model we want to explain.

library(xgboost)
library(data.table)
#> data.table 1.16.2 using 16 threads (see ?getDTthreads).  Latest news: r-datatable.com

data("airquality")
data <- data.table::as.data.table(airquality)
data <- data[complete.cases(data), ]

x_var <- c("Solar.R", "Wind", "Temp", "Month")
y_var <- "Ozone"

ind_x_explain <- 1:6
x_train <- data[-ind_x_explain, ..x_var]
y_train <- data[-ind_x_explain, get(y_var)]
x_explain <- data[ind_x_explain, ..x_var]

# Fitting a basic xgboost model to the training data
model <- xgboost(
  data = as.matrix(x_train),
  label = y_train,
  nround = 100,
  verbose = FALSE
)

# Specifying the phi_0, i.e. the expected prediction without any features
phi0 <- mean(y_train)

First vaeac example

We are now going to explain predictions made by the model using the vaeac approach.

n_MC_samples <- 25 # Low number of MC samples to make the vignette build faster
vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize <- 2 # Initialize several vaeacs to counteract bad initialization values
vaeac.epochs <- 4 # The number of training epochs

explanation <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  vaeac.epochs = vaeac.epochs,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 19:59:59 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c933afb44f.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

We can look at the Shapley values.

# Printing and ploting the Shapley values.
# See ?shapr::explain for interpretation of the values.
print(explanation$shapley_values_est)
#>    explain_id     none    Solar.R        Wind       Temp      Month
#>         <int>    <num>      <num>       <num>      <num>      <num>
#> 1:          1 43.08572  4.3582680  -0.4948663 -16.717263  0.5535165
#> 2:          2 43.08571 -2.0696785  -2.7666843 -17.375969 -1.8428742
#> 3:          3 43.08571  1.2425910  -5.0586505 -18.791919 -0.6818670
#> 4:          4 43.08571  5.2083437 -10.0374107  -8.480697 -1.2813575
#> 5:          5 43.08571  0.2212691  -3.0584692 -17.917710 -3.6207951
#> 6:          6 43.08572  4.2557578  -9.5851397 -18.712318  2.6201697
plot(explanation)

Pre-trained vaeac

If the user has a pre-trained vaeac model (from a previous run), the user can send that to the explain() function and shapr will skip the training of a new vaeac model and rather use the provided vaeac model. This is useful if we want to explain new predictions using the same combinations/coalitions as previously, i.e., we have a new x_explain. Note that the new x_explain must have the same features as before.

The vaeac model is accessible via explanation$internal$parameters$vaeac. Note that if we let 'vS_detail' %in% verbose in explain(), then shapr will give a message that it loads a pretrained vaeac model instead of training it from scratch.

In this example, we extract the trained vaeac model from the previous example and send it to explain().

# Send the pre-trained vaeac model
expl_pretrained_vaeac <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(
    vaeac.pretrained_vaeac_model = explanation$internal$parameters$vaeac
  )
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:00:10 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c93a966a6.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

# Check that this version provides the same Shapley values
all.equal(explanation$shapley_values_est, expl_pretrained_vaeac$shapley_values_est)
#> [1] TRUE

Pre-trained vaeac (path)

We can also just provide a path to the stored vaeac model. This is beneficial if we have only stored the vaeac model on the computer but not the whole explanation object. The possible save paths are stored in explanation$internal$parameters$vaeac$model. Note that if we let 'vS_detail' %in% verbose in explain(), then shapr will give a message that it loads a pretrained vaeac model instead of training it from scratch.

# Call `explanation$internal$parameters$vaeac$model` to see possible vaeac models. We use `best` below.
# send the pre-trained vaeac path
expl_pretrained_vaeac_path <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(
    vaeac.pretrained_vaeac_model = explanation$internal$parameters$vaeac$models$best
  )
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:00:15 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c93259a4780.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

# Check that this version provides the same Shapley values
all.equal(explanation$shapley_values_est, expl_pretrained_vaeac_path$shapley_values_est)
#> [1] TRUE

Specified max_n_coalitions

In this section, we discuss a general shapr parameter in the explain() function that is method independent, namely, max_n_coalitions. The user can limit the Shapley value computations to only a subset of coalitions by setting the max_n_coalitions parameter to a value lower than 2nfeatures2^{n_\text{features}}.

Note that we do not need to train a new vaeac model as we can use the one above trained on all 16 coalitions as we are now only using a subset of them. This is not applicable the other way around.

# send the pre-trained vaeac path
expl_batches_combinations <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  max_n_coalitions = 10,
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(
    vaeac.pretrained_vaeac_model = explanation$internal$parameters$vaeac
  )
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:00:19 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c937a7cee44.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 10 of 16 coalitions.

# Gives different Shapley values as the latter one are only based on a subset of coalitions
plot_SV_several_approaches(list("Original" = explanation, "Other combi." = expl_batches_combinations))


# Can compare that to the situation where we have exact computations (i.e., include all coalitions)
explanation$internal$objects$X
#>     id_coalition coalitions coalition_size     N shapley_weight sample_freq features approach
#>            <int>     <list>          <int> <int>          <num>      <lgcl>   <list>   <char>
#>  1:            1                         0     1       1.00e+06          NA             vaeac
#>  2:            2          1              1     4       2.50e-01          NA        1    vaeac
#>  3:            3          2              1     4       2.50e-01          NA        2    vaeac
#>  4:            4          3              1     4       2.50e-01          NA        3    vaeac
#>  5:            5          4              1     4       2.50e-01          NA        4    vaeac
#>  6:            6        1,2              2     6       1.25e-01          NA      1,2    vaeac
#>  7:            7        1,3              2     6       1.25e-01          NA      1,3    vaeac
#>  8:            8        1,4              2     6       1.25e-01          NA      1,4    vaeac
#>  9:            9        2,3              2     6       1.25e-01          NA      2,3    vaeac
#> 10:           10        2,4              2     6       1.25e-01          NA      2,4    vaeac
#> 11:           11        3,4              2     6       1.25e-01          NA      3,4    vaeac
#> 12:           12      1,2,3              3     4       2.50e-01          NA    1,2,3    vaeac
#> 13:           13      1,2,4              3     4       2.50e-01          NA    1,2,4    vaeac
#> 14:           14      1,3,4              3     4       2.50e-01          NA    1,3,4    vaeac
#> 15:           15      2,3,4              3     4       2.50e-01          NA    2,3,4    vaeac
#> 16:           16    1,2,3,4              4     1       1.00e+06          NA  1,2,3,4    vaeac

Note that if we train a vaeac model from scratch with the setup above, then the vaeac model will not use a missing completely as random (MCAR) mask generator, but rather a mask generator that ensures that the vaeac model is only trained on the specified set of coalitions. In this case, it will be the set of the sampled coalitions.

expl_batches_combinations_2 <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  max_n_coalitions = 10,
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 1,
  vaeac.epochs = 3,
  verbose = "vS_details"
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Extra info about the pretrained vaeac model โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> Training the `vaeac` model with the provided parameters from scratch on CPU.
#> Using 'specified_masks_mask_generator' with '10' coalitions.
#> The vaeac model contains 17032 trainable parameters.
#> Initializing vaeac model number 1 of 1.
#> Best vaeac inititalization was number 1 (of 1) with a training VLB = -6.489 after 2 epochs. Continue to
#> train this inititalization.
#> 
#> Results of the `vaeac` training process:
#> Best epoch:             3.   VLB = -4.736    IWAE = -3.231   IWAE_running = -3.482
#> Best running avg epoch: 3.   VLB = -4.736    IWAE = -3.231   IWAE_running = -3.482
#> Last epoch:             3.   VLB = -4.736    IWAE = -3.231   IWAE_running = -3.482
#> โ„น The trained `vaeac` models are saved to folder '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy' at
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.00.24.69317_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.00.24.69317_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best_running.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.00.24.69317_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_last.pt'

Paired sampling

The vaeac approach can use paired sampling to improve the stability of the vaeac training procedure. When using paired sampling, each observation in the training batches will be duplicated, but the first version will be masked by SS and the second verion will be masked by the complement Sโ€พ\bar{S}. The mask are taken from the explanation$internal$objects$S matrix. Note that vaeac does not check if the complement is also in said matrix. This means that if the Shapley value explanations are computed based on a subset of coalitions, then the vaeac model might be trained on coalitions which are not used when computing the Shapley values. This should not be considered as redundant training as it increases the stablility and performance of the vaeac model as a whole, hence, we reccomend to use paried samping (default). Furthermore, the masks are randomly selected for each observation in the batch. The training time when using paired sampling is higher in comparison to random sampling due to more complex implementation.

expl_paired_sampling_TRUE <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  vaeac.epochs = 10,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 1,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(vaeac.paired_sampling = TRUE)
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:00:32 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c93194f586e.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

expl_paired_sampling_FALSE <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  vaeac.epochs = 10,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 1,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(vaeac.paired_sampling = FALSE)
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:00:44 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c937aee27ae.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

We can compare the results by looking at the training and validation errors and by the MSEvMSE_v evaluation criterion. We do this by using the plot_vaeac_eval_crit() and plot_MSEv_eval_crit() functions in the shapr package, respectively.

explanation_list <- list("Regular samp." = expl_paired_sampling_FALSE,
                         "Paired samp." = expl_paired_sampling_TRUE)
plot_vaeac_eval_crit(explanation_list, plot_type = "criterion")

plot_MSEv_eval_crit(explanation_list)

By looking at the time, we see that the paired version takes (a bit) longer time in the setup_computation phase, that is, in the training phase.

rbind(
  "Paired" = expl_paired_sampling_TRUE$timing$overall_timing_secs,
  "Regular" = expl_paired_sampling_FALSE$timing$overall_timing_secs
)
#>            setup test_prediction main_computation finalize_explanation
#> Paired  0.049229        0.036201           12.333            0.0043070
#> Regular 0.047371        0.034762           10.895            0.0043063

Progressr

As discussed in the general usage, the shapr package provides two ways for receiving information about the progress of the approach. First, the shapr package provides progress updates of the computation of the Shapley values through the progressr package. Second, the user can also get various form of information through verbose in explain(). By letting 'vS_detail' %in% verbose, we get extra information related to the vaeac approach. The verbose parameter works independently of the progressr package. Meaning that the user can chose to use none, either, or both options simultaneously. We give two examples here, and refer the reader to the general usage for more detailed information.

By setting c("basic", vS_details"), we get both basic messages about the explanation case, and messages about the estimation of the vaeac approach.

expl_with_messages <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  verbose = c("basic","vS_details"),
  vaeac.epochs = 5,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 2
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:00:58 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c931bbb2f14.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Extra info about the pretrained vaeac model โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> Training the `vaeac` model with the provided parameters from scratch on CPU.
#> Using 'mcar_mask_generator' with 'masking_ratio = 0.5'.
#> The vaeac model contains 17032 trainable parameters.
#> Initializing vaeac model number 1 of 2.
#> Initializing vaeac model number 2 of 2.
#> Best vaeac inititalization was number 2 (of 2) with a training VLB = -4.566 after 2 epochs. Continue to
#> train this inititalization.
#> 
#> Results of the `vaeac` training process:
#> Best epoch:             5.   VLB = -3.318    IWAE = -3.049   IWAE_running = -3.149
#> Best running avg epoch: 5.   VLB = -3.318    IWAE = -3.049   IWAE_running = -3.149
#> Last epoch:             5.   VLB = -3.318    IWAE = -3.049   IWAE_running = -3.149
#> โ„น The trained `vaeac` models are saved to folder '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy' at
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.00.58.727562_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.00.58.727562_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best_running.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.00.58.727562_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_last.pt'

For more visual information we can use the progressr package. This can help us see detailed progress of the training step for the final vaeac model. Note that by default vS_details is not part of verbose, meaning that we do not get any messages from the vaeac, approach and only get the progress bars. See the general usage for examples for how to change the progress bar.

library(progressr)
progressr::handlers("cli") # Use `progressr::handlers("void")` to silence all `progressr` updates
progressr::with_progress({
  expl_with_progressr <- explain(
    model = model,
    x_explain = x_explain,
    x_train = x_train,
    approach = "vaeac",
    phi0 = phi0,
    n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
    verbose = "vS_details",
    vaeac.epochs = 5,
    vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 2
  )
})
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Extra info about the pretrained vaeac model โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> Training the `vaeac` model with the provided parameters from scratch on CPU.
#> Using 'mcar_mask_generator' with 'masking_ratio = 0.5'.
#> The vaeac model contains 17032 trainable parameters.
#> Initializing vaeac model number 1 of 2.
#> 
                                                                                                          
Initializing vaeac model number 2 of 2.
#> โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ–                         29% | Training vaeac (init. 1 of 2): Epoch: 2 | VLB: -6.593 | IWAE: -3โ€ฆ

                                                                                                          
Best vaeac inititalization was number 2 (of 2) with a training VLB = -4.566 after 2 epochs. Continue to
#> train this inititalization.
#> โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ– โ–                 57% | Training vaeac (init. 2 of 2): Epoch: 2 | VLB: -4.566 | IWAE: -3โ€ฆ
#> Results of the `vaeac` training process:
#> Best epoch:             5.   VLB = -3.318    IWAE = -3.049   IWAE_running = -3.149
#> Best running avg epoch: 5.   VLB = -3.318    IWAE = -3.049   IWAE_running = -3.149
#> Last epoch:             5.   VLB = -3.318    IWAE = -3.049   IWAE_running = -3.149
#> 
#> โ„น The trained `vaeac` models are saved to folder '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy' at
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.01.09.652795_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.01.09.652795_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best_running.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.01.09.652795_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_last.pt'
all.equal(expl_with_messages$shapley_values_est, expl_with_progressr$shapley_values_est)
#> [1] TRUE

Continue the training of the vaeac approach

In the case the user has set a too low number of training epochs and sees that the network is still learning, then the user can continue to train the network from where it stopped. Thus, a good workflow can therefore be to call the explain() function with a n_MC_samples = 1 (to not waste to much time to generate MC samples), then look at the training and evaluation plots of the vaeac. If not satisfied, then train more. If satisfied, then call the explain() function again but this time by using the extra parameter vaeac.pretrained_vaeac_model, as illustrated above. Note that we have set the number of vaeac.epochs to be very low in this example and we recommend to use many more epochs.

We can compare the results by looking at the training and validation errors and by the MSEvMSE_v evaluation criterion. We do this by using the plot_vaeac_eval_crit() and plot_MSEv_eval_crit() functions in the shapr package, respectively. We also use the plot_vaeac_imputed_ggpairs() function which generates samples from p(x)p(x), this is ment as a sanity check to see that the vaeac model is able to follow the general structure/distribution of the data. However, recall that the vaeac model is never trained on the empty coalition, so the produced samples should be taken with a grain of salt.

expl_little_training <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = 250,
  vaeac.epochs = 3,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 2
)

# Look at the training and validation errors. Not happy and want to train more.
plot_vaeac_eval_crit(list("Original" = expl_little_training), plot_type = "method")

# Can also see how well vaeac generates data from the full joint distribution. Quite good.
plot_vaeac_imputed_ggpairs(
  explanation = expl_little_training,
  which_vaeac_model = "best",
  x_true = x_train
) + ggplot2::labs(title = NULL)

# Make a copy of the explanation object and continue to train the vaeac model some more epochs
expl_train_more <- expl_little_training
expl_train_more$internal$parameters$vaeac <-
  vaeac_train_model_continue(
    explanation = expl_train_more,
    epochs_new = 5,
    x_train = x_train
  )

# Compute the Shapley values again but this time using the extra trained vaeac model
expl_train_more_vaeac <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = 250,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(
    vaeac.pretrained_vaeac_model = expl_train_more$internal$parameters$vaeac
  )
)

# Look at the training and validation errors and conclude that we want to train some more
plot_vaeac_eval_crit(
  list("Original" = expl_little_training, "More epochs" = expl_train_more),
  plot_type = "method"
)

# Continue to train the vaeac model some more epochs
expl_train_even_more <- expl_train_more
expl_train_even_more$internal$parameters$vaeac <-
  vaeac_train_model_continue(
    explanation = expl_train_even_more,
    epochs_new = 10,
    x_train = x_train
  )

# Compute the Shapley values again but this time using the even more trained vaeac model
expl_train_even_more_vaeac <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = 250,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(
    vaeac.pretrained_vaeac_model = expl_train_even_more$internal$parameters$vaeac
  )
)

# Look at the training and validation errors.
plot_vaeac_eval_crit(
  list(
    "Original" = expl_little_training,
    "More epochs" = expl_train_more,
    "Even more epochs" = expl_train_even_more
  ),
  plot_type = "method"
)

# Can also see how well vaeac generates data from the full joint distribution
plot_vaeac_imputed_ggpairs(
  explanation = expl_train_even_more,
  which_vaeac_model = "best",
  x_true = x_train
) + ggplot2::labs(title = NULL)

We can see that the extra training has decreased the MSEv score. The Shapley value explanations have also changed, but they are often comparable.

plot_MSEv_eval_crit(list(
  "Few epochs" = expl_little_training,
  "More epochs" = expl_train_more_vaeac,
  "Even more epochs" = expl_train_even_more_vaeac
))

# We see that the Shapley values have changed, but they are often comparable
plot_SV_several_approaches(list(
  "Few epochs" = expl_little_training,
  "More epochs" = expl_train_more_vaeac,
  "Even more epochs" = expl_train_even_more_vaeac
))

Vaeac with early stopping

If we do not want to specify the number of epochs, as we are uncertain how many epochs it will take before the vaeac model is properly trained, a good choice is to rather use early stopping. This means that we can set vaeac.epochs to a large number and let vaeac.epochs_early_stopping be for example 5. This means that the vaeac model will stop the training procedure if there has been no improvement in the validation score for 5 epochs.

# Low value for `vaeac.epochs_early_stopping` here to build the vignette faster
expl_early_stopping <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = 250,
  verbose = c("basic","vS_details"),
  vaeac.epochs = 1000, # Set it to a big number
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 2,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(vaeac.epochs_early_stopping = 2)
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:03:10 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c93198eb87f.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Extra info about the pretrained vaeac model โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> Training the `vaeac` model with the provided parameters from scratch on CPU.
#> Using 'mcar_mask_generator' with 'masking_ratio = 0.5'.
#> The vaeac model contains 17032 trainable parameters.
#> Initializing vaeac model number 1 of 2.
#> Initializing vaeac model number 2 of 2.
#> Best vaeac inititalization was number 2 (of 2) with a training VLB = -4.566 after 2 epochs. Continue to
#> train this inititalization.
#> No IWAE improvment in 2 epochs. Apply early stopping at epoch 14.
#> 
#> Results of the `vaeac` training process:
#> Best epoch:             12.  VLB = -2.958    IWAE = -2.930   IWAE_running = -2.991
#> Best running avg epoch: 12.  VLB = -2.958    IWAE = -2.930   IWAE_running = -2.991
#> Last epoch:             14.  VLB = -2.971    IWAE = -2.955   IWAE_running = -2.996
#> โ„น The trained `vaeac` models are saved to folder '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy' at
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.03.10.227966_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.03.10.227966_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best_running.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.03.10.227966_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_last.pt'

# Look at the training and validation errors. We are quite happy with it.
plot_vaeac_eval_crit(
  list("Vaeac early stopping" = expl_early_stopping),
  plot_type = "method"
)

However, we can train it further for a fixed amount of epochs if desired. This can be in a setting where we are not happy with the IWAE curve or we feel that we set vaeac.epochs_early_stopping to a too low value or if the max number of epochs (vaeac.epochs) were reached.

# Make a copy of the explanation object which we are to train further.
expl_early_stopping_train_more <- expl_early_stopping

# Continue to train the vaeac model some more epochs
expl_early_stopping_train_more$internal$parameters$vaeac <-
  vaeac_train_model_continue(
    explanation = expl_early_stopping_train_more,
    epochs_new = 15,
    x_train = x_train,
    verbose = NULL
  )

# Can even do it twice if desired
expl_early_stopping_train_more$internal$parameters$vaeac <-
  vaeac_train_model_continue(
    explanation = expl_early_stopping_train_more,
    epochs_new = 10,
    x_train = x_train,
    verbose = NULL
  )

# Look at the training and validation errors. We see some improvement
plot_vaeac_eval_crit(
  list(
    "Vaeac early stopping" = expl_early_stopping,
    "Vaeac early stopping more epochs" = expl_early_stopping_train_more
  ),
  plot_type = "method"
)

We can then use the extra trained version to compute the Shapley value explanations and compare it with the previous version that used early stopping. We see a non-significant difference.

# Use extra trained vaeac model to compute Shapley values again.
expl_early_stopping_train_more <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = 250,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(
    vaeac.pretrained_vaeac_model = expl_early_stopping_train_more$internal$parameters$vaeac
  )
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:04:15 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <xgb.Booster>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c9341ad4ace.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

# We can compare their MSEv scores
plot_MSEv_eval_crit(list(
  "Vaeac early stopping" = expl_early_stopping,
  "Vaeac early stopping more epochs" = expl_early_stopping_train_more
))

# We see that the Shapley values have changed, but only slightly
plot_SV_several_approaches(list(
  "Vaeac early stopping" = expl_early_stopping,
  "Vaeac early stopping more epochs" = expl_early_stopping_train_more
))

Grouping of features

When we train a vaeac model to explain groups of features, then the vaeac model will use the โ€œSpecified_masks_mask_generatorโ€ which ensures that the vaeac model only train on a specified set of coalitions. In this case, it will ensure that all features in group A will always either be conditioned on or be unconditioned. The same goes for group B. Note that in this setup, there are only 4 possible coalitions, but vaeac only train on 2 coalitions as the empty and grand coalitions as they are not needed in the Shapley value computations.

expl_group <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain,
  x_train = x_train,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  group = list(A = c("Temp", "Month"), B = c("Wind", "Solar.R")),
  n_MC_samples = n_MC_samples,
  verbose = "vS_details",
  vaeac.epochs = 4,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 2
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_groups = 4, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_groups = 4.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Extra info about the pretrained vaeac model โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> Training the `vaeac` model with the provided parameters from scratch on CPU.
#> Using 'specified_masks_mask_generator' with '4' coalitions.
#> The vaeac model contains 17032 trainable parameters.
#> Initializing vaeac model number 1 of 2.
#> Initializing vaeac model number 2 of 2.
#> Best vaeac inititalization was number 2 (of 2) with a training VLB = -4.453 after 2 epochs. Continue to
#> train this inititalization.
#> 
#> Results of the `vaeac` training process:
#> Best epoch:             4.   VLB = -3.514    IWAE = -3.114   IWAE_running = -3.153
#> Best running avg epoch: 4.   VLB = -3.514    IWAE = -3.114   IWAE_running = -3.153
#> Last epoch:             4.   VLB = -3.514    IWAE = -3.114   IWAE_running = -3.153
#> โ„น The trained `vaeac` models are saved to folder '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy' at
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.04.45.408325_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.04.45.408325_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_best_running.pt'
#> '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/X2024.11.21.20.04.45.408325_n_features_4_n_train_105_depth_3_width_32_latent_8_lr_0.001_epoch_last.pt'

# Plot the resulting explanations
plot(expl_group)

Mixed Data

Here we look at a setup with mixed data, i.e., the data contains both categorical and continuous features. First we set up the data and the model.

library(ranger)
#> ranger 0.17.0 using 2 threads (default). Change with num.threads in ranger() and predict(), options(Ncpus = N), options(ranger.num.threads = N) or environment variable R_RANGER_NUM_THREADS.
data <- data.table::as.data.table(airquality)
data <- data[complete.cases(data), ]

# convert the month variable to a factor
data[, Month_factor := as.factor(Month)]

x_var_cat <- c("Solar.R", "Wind", "Temp", "Month_factor")
y_var <- "Ozone"

ind_x_explain <- 1:6

data_train_cat <- data[-ind_x_explain, ]
x_train_cat <- data_train_cat[, ..x_var_cat]
x_explain_cat <- data[ind_x_explain, ][, ..x_var_cat]

# Fit a random forest model to the training data
model <- ranger(as.formula(paste0(y_var, " ~ ", paste0(x_var_cat, collapse = " + "))),
  data = data_train_cat
)

# Specifying the phi_0, i.e. the expected prediction without any features
phi0 <- mean(data_train_cat[, get(y_var)])

Then we compute explanations using the ctree and vaeac approaches. For the vaeac approach, we consider two setups: the default architecture, and a simpler one without skip connections. We do this to illustrate that the skip connections improve the vaeac method. We use ctree with default parameters.

# Here we use the ctree approach
expl_ctree <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain_cat,
  x_train = x_train_cat,
  approach = "ctree",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = 250
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:04:53 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <ranger>
#> โ€ข Approach: ctree
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c93620526e3.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

# Then we use the vaeac approach
expl_vaeac_with <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain_cat,
  x_train = x_train_cat,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = 250,
  vaeac.epochs = 50,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 4
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:04:55 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <ranger>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c932b9a671e.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

# Then we use the vaeac approach
expl_vaeac_without <- explain(
  model = model,
  x_explain = x_explain_cat,
  x_train = x_train_cat,
  approach = "vaeac",
  phi0 = phi0,
  n_MC_samples = 250,
  vaeac.epochs = 50,
  vaeac.n_vaeacs_initialize = 4,
  vaeac.extra_parameters = list(
    vaeac.skip_conn_layer = FALSE,
    vaeac.skip_conn_masked_enc_dec = FALSE
  )
)
#> Note: Feature classes extracted from the model contains NA.
#> Assuming feature classes from the data are correct.
#> Success with message:
#> max_n_coalitions is NULL or larger than or 2^n_features = 16, 
#> and is therefore set to 2^n_features = 16.
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Starting `shapr::explain()` at 2024-11-21 20:06:15 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
#> โ€ข Model class: <ranger>
#> โ€ข Approach: vaeac
#> โ€ข Iterative estimation: FALSE
#> โ€ข Number of feature-wise Shapley values: 4
#> โ€ข Number of observations to explain: 6
#> โ€ข Computations (temporary) saved at: '/tmp/RtmpCcS4cy/shapr_obj_1b8c935a5fe38f.rds'
#> 
#> โ”€โ”€ Main computation started โ”€โ”€
#> 
#> โ„น Using 16 of 16 coalitions.

# We see that the `vaeac` model without the skip connections perform worse
plot_vaeac_eval_crit(
  list(
    "Vaeac w.o. skip-con." = expl_vaeac_without,
    "Vaeac w. skip-con." = expl_vaeac_with
  ),
  plot_type = "criterion"
)

# The vaeac model with skip connections have the lowest/best MSE_Frye evaluation criterion score
plot_MSEv_eval_crit(list(
  "Vaeac w.o. skip-con." = expl_vaeac_without,
  "Vaeac w. skip-con." = expl_vaeac_with,
  "Ctree" = expl_ctree
))

# Can compare the Shapley values. Ctree and vaeac with skip connections produce similar explanations.
plot_SV_several_approaches(
  list(
    "Vaeac w.o. skip-con." = expl_vaeac_without,
    "Vaeac w. skip-con." = expl_vaeac_with,
    "Ctree" = expl_ctree
  ),
  index_explicands = 1:6
)

Falbel, Daniel, and Javier Luraschi. 2023. Torch: Tensors and Neural Networks with โ€™GPUโ€™ Acceleration. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=torch.
Kingma, Diederik P., and Max Welling. 2014. โ€œAuto-Encoding Variational Bayes.โ€ In 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada, April 14-16, 2014, Conference Track Proceedings.
Olsen, Lars Henry Berge, Ingrid Kristine Glad, Martin Jullum, and Kjersti Aas. 2022. โ€œUsing Shapley Values and Variational Autoencoders to Explain Predictive Models with Dependent Mixed Features.โ€ Journal of Machine Learning Research 23 (213): 1โ€“51.